Devastating. I mean, they almost killed me four months ago. So, there is a difference between a bacteria and depending on what mode of toxins they're producing. You said they are using the waste, but I think probably this only applies for aerobics, which are using the oxygen.
So, what do you do about the toxins that almost killed me four months ago? I mean, I couldn't live with those in my. .
Well, you could, you had so much toxicity and not enough of the right nutrients to break it down, and if you don't have the right nutrients, your body can't support itself in its natural function.
I have seven root canals and I'm almost 60 years old, and I don't have any problems.
Because your body is detoxifying properly, yes.
Exactly. Got the nutrients.
You are detoxifying: your liver, your skin; they're all working.
And the nerves to the teeth.
Yes. And your immune system handles detox properly.
But if you are in a toxic state, then that's a different story.
The bacteria will be a good thing then?
The bacteria's always good. It's just are you gonna work with the bacteria or you gonna work against it? If you work with it, you eat properly to make sure your body cleanses and heals properly. It's simple as that.
If you don't, if you want to continue french fries and potato chips and cereals and garbage food, then you're going to invite the non-healing and non-proper detoxification of your body and you're going to have problems with those particular bacteria, but the bacteria is not the problem. he have reverse sudden, a sudden his diet.
Are there any acceptable invasive measure because obviously his toxic level probably threatens his life. Is there some other acceptable modality that can be a little more evasive at the beginning, sort of even the playing field. And then go back to the more natural.
Well, it's everybody's risk how they want to do it.
You take antibiotics to do it, you destroy your digestive abilities with the chance that you'll lose your taste buds, you'll lose your ability to digest anything. There you're taking your chances. So, would you rather take a chance on the localized infection or would you rather take a chance on polluting the entire system and breaking it down? It's up to you.
It's an individual course and I certainly encourage people to use the natural course rather than the other natural course because the side effects will be a lot less and they're a lot less complicated to get well if you're following the natural.
In his case, he was told his life was in threat.
I hear that bullshit all the time doctors are loaded with that. That is their modus operandi. "This is dangerous". You know how many times I was told I was in danger? I went through the chemotherapy and everything. They said, "You're absolutely going to die. You've gotta take this chemo, you only have 1% chance of living, but you have to take it".
1% chance of living, 1%. And you want me to poison myself and vomit every day more, lose my hair more crawl, around like a worm and that's the way you want me to live? It's an absurdity.
I said, if the person is an elderly person and can't do it.
That applies to me, I guess.
Well, no, you're pretty healthy. I think you would've made it, really very easily as a matter of fact.
I'm talking about these feeble old people that are going around like this, those are the kind that won't make it because they just don't have enough strength and nutrients in their body, even if they go on a raw diet to clean out for maybe five years, they can't endure that.
So how would he have gotten a good second opinion to counteract the first?
There's no way he would've gotten a good second opinion, they're all freaked out. They're all indoctrinated by it.